Historical References to 'the Happy Family.'

There are several direct historical references (and as many allusions) to the 'Happy Family' of John Austin, and to others who borrowed the idea or the actual practice, as follows below:

Contemporary References

John Austin, whose curious little menagerie has often attracted our attention on the Waterloo and Southwark bridges, has been taken under the patronage of the Zoological Society, in the gardens of which his collection may now be seen.

 

C.H. Spurgeon Direct Reference

The Plea of Faith, a sermon preached at Exeter Hall on Sunday evening, June 22, 1856 (during the second year of Spurgeon's ministry in London, and just three days after his 22nd birthday).

hat is the reason why yon man hates me, because I preach what I believe to be right? If I do speak the truth am I responsible for his hating me? Not in the least degree.

I am sometimes told by my people that I attack certain parties very hard. Well, I cannot help it; if they are not right, it is not my fault—if they come in my way, that I am compelled to run over them. Suppose two of you should be driving in the road to-morrow, and one of you should be on the right side of the road, and some accident should occur, you would say, "Sir, the other man ought to have pulled up, he must pay the damages, for he had no business there at all on his wrong side." And it will be the same with us if we preach God's truth; we must go straight on; if the greatest ill feeling in the world rise up we have nothing to do with it.

God's truth will sometimes bring about warfare; Jesus Christ, you know, said himself that he came to put warfare between man and man; to set the mother-in-law against the daughter-in-law, and the daughter-in-law against the mother-inlaw; and that a man's foes should be those of his own household. But if there be ill-feeling, if there be clamoring of sects, to whom is it due? Who is responsible for it? Why, the man who makes the new sects, not the man who abides fast and firm by the old one.

If I am safely moored by a good strong anchor of fundamental truth, and some other shall strike my vessel and sink himself, I will not pay the damages. I stand firm: if others choose to go away from the truth, to cut their cables and slip their moorings; then let them. God grant that we may not do the same. Hold the truth, my friends, and hold it as the easiest method of sweeping away heresies and false doctrines.

But now-a-days, you know, you are told, "Oh, it does not matter what you believe; doctrines are nothing;" and they have tried lately to make a very happy family of us, like the happy family near Waterloo Bridge, where all kinds of creatures are shut up together; but they are only kept in order by a lath which the man, when we turn our heads, applies between the bars of the cage.

Just so with denominations; they want to amalgamate us all. We differ in various doctrines, and therefore some of us must be wrong, if we hold doctrines which are directly hostile to each other. But we are told, "It does not signify; doubtless, you are all right."

Now, I cannot see that. If I say one thing, and another man says another, how, by all that is holy, can both speak the truth? Shall black and white be the same color? Shall falsehood and truth be the same? When they shall be, and fire shall sleep in the same cradle with the waves of the ocean, then shall we agree to amalgamate ourselves with those who deny our doctrines, or speak evil of what we believe to be the gospel.

My brethren, no man has any right to absolve your judgment from allegiance to God; there is liberty of conscience between man and man, but there is none between God and man.

No man has a right to believe what he likes; he is to believe what God tells him; and if he does not believe that though he is not responsible to man, or to any set of men, or to any government, yet mark you, he is responsible to God. I beseech you, therefore, if you would avoid heresies, and bring the church to a glorious union, read the Scriptures.

Read not so much man's comments, or man's books, but read the Scriptures, and keep your faith on this,—"God has said it."

-------------

Probable Indirect Reference - Spurgeon's Sermons on Old Testament Men; Book 2

. . . will not enter into fellowship with falsehood, no, not for an hour. If a course be right and true, through floods and flames it'Jesus leads me, I will pursue it.." That seems to me to be the right spirit, but where do you find it now-a-days? The modern spirit mutters, "We are all right, every one of us." He who says "yes" is right, and he who says "no" is also right. You hear a man talk with mawkish sentimentality which he calls Christian charity."Well, 1 am of opiuion that if a man is a Mahometan, or a Catholic, or a. Mormonite, or a dissenter, if he is sincere, he is all right." They do not quite include devil worshippers, Thugs and cannibals yet, but if things go on they will accept them into the happy family of the Broad Church. Such is the talk and cant of this present age, but I bear my witness that there is no truth in it, und I call upon every child of God to protest against it, and, like Moses, to declare that he can have no complicity with such a confederacy. There is truth somewhere, let us find it; the lie is not of the truth, let us abhor it. There is a God, let us follow him, and it cannot be that false gods are gods too. Surely truth is of some value to the sons of men, surely there must be something worth holding, something worth contending for, and something worth dying for; but it does not appear now-a-days as if men thought so. May we have a respect for God's true church in the world which abides by the apostolic word and doctrine. Let us find it out, and join with it, and at its side fight for God and for his truth ! . . .


John Austin's Death

He stopped on this same spot, opposite, the Feathers public-house, from his first coming to the day he left it, a short space before he died, for 36 years all but 5 months. (John Austin)'s been dead for four years, the 17 of last February, 1856, and then he wasn't getting 2s. 6d a-day. (i.e. John Austin died in 1852)


A Traveller's Reference

In Jermyns-street, directly in front of our hotel, every afternoon a set of men in semi-mountebank and Highland coswtumes went through all sorts of festes, rivaling the Ravel family. The party consisted of three or four, and sometimes five. The street was regarded as their legitimate board, and cloths were laid down and the antics played off without any hindrance from the police, who frequently looked on. The eyes of the performers were often directed to the windows of our hotel and one opposite; and I fance the returns were tolerably satisfactory, as they came day by day. The Happy Family, too proved a constant source of interest; while Punch and Judy proved as omnipotent in attraction as they were in the beginning, and ever will be. (The Cruise of the Steam Yacht North Star: A Narrative of the Excursion of Mr ...?- Page 56, by John Overton Choules - 1854)


P.T. Barnum

Struggles and Triumphs, Or Forty Years' Recollections of P.T. Barnum, By Phineas Taylor Barnum

In England Again: p. 237 . . . nr Kenilworth Caste. . . .We spent half an hour in examining the interesting ruins and then proceeded by post-chaise to Coventry, a distance of six or eight miles. Here we remained four hours, during which time we visitied St. Mary's Hall, which as attracted the notice of many antiquaries . . .

p. 238 We also took our own 'peep' at the effigy of the celebrated 'Peeping Tom,' after which we visited an exhibition called the 'Happy Family,' consisting of about two hundred birds and animals of opposite natures and propensities, all living in harmony together in one cage. This exhibition was so remarkable that I bought it and hired the proprietor to accompany it to New York, and it became an attractive feature in my Museum.

(During 1844-45, Barnum toured with Tom Thumb in Europe and met Queen Victoria, who was amused and saddened by the little man, and the event was a publicity coup.)

Early in his career, P. T. Barnum created an exhibit, entitled "The Happy Family," consisting of a cage housing a lion, a tiger, a panther - and a baby lamb. The remarkable display earned Barnum unprecedented publicity and attendance figures. Some time after its opening, Barnum was asked about his plans for the happy family. "The display will become a permanent feature," he declared, "if the supply of lambs holds out."

----------

Barnum saw and bought Happy Family at Coventry - They visited that same day Kenilworth and Coventry, in which latter place Barnum discovered the exhibition known as the "Happy Family," about two hundred birds and animals of opposite natures, dwelling in one cage in perfect harmony. He was so delighted with it that he bought it on the spot, and hired the manager to accompany the exhibition to New York, where it became a famous feature of the Museum.

-----------

P.T. Barnum, by A. H. Saxon in the mag: 'The Universal Yankee' - p. 133 - The following happened in 1844 (Coventry)

It was also during this initial sweep through the provinces that Barnum set out, on 5 September, on a whirlwind tour of the Shakespeare country in the company of the London author and journalist Albert Smith. Smtih, who was later to become a showman and popular lecturer himself, most notably in his entertainment based on his bibulous 1851 ascent of Mont Blanc, and who loosely based the character of the shoman Rosset on Barnum in his 1845 novel ' The Fortunes of the Scatterfood Family,' eventualy recorded the adventures of their crowded day in a two part article for Bentley's 'Miscellany.' As he described their travels - which commenced at 5 AM in Birmingham and went on to take in all the Stratford sights, Warwick and Kennilworth castles, a far being held in the vicinity of the former, and Coventry - Barnum attempted to purchase everything that struck his fancy along their route and was indignantly rebuffed when he offered to buy the 'wonderful relices' of the legendary giant, Guy of Warwick. In Coventry, however, he did manage to acquire 'a wandering exhibtion of animals of dissimilar habits all in one cage' - the American Museum's original 'Happy Family,' obvious, Barnhum himself devoted considereaible space to this trip in his articles for the 'Atlas' and, to a lesser extent, in his autiobiography. He makes no mention in either source of trying to purchase Guy of Warwick's trumpery, but does tell how he complimented the guide who shoed them these outsized articles 'for having concentrated more lies than I ever before heard in so small a compass.' Thje guide laughed at this remark and evidently felt gratified. At the fair conncected with the Warwick Races, the inquisitive showman was knockd flat by a Canadian giantess when he raised her dress to see if some trick was involved (he was right: she was standing on a pedestal). The purchase of the 'Happy Family' cost him $2,500.

-----------

No. 884. -- CASE -- THE HAPPY FAMILY. A miscellaneous collection of beasts and birds (upwards of sixty in number), living together harmoniously in one large cage, each of them being the mortal enemy of every other, but contentedly playing and frolicking together, without injury or discord. At the time of the issue of this book, the family comprises 8 doves, 4 owls, 10 rats, 2 cats, 2 dogs, 1 hawk, 3 rabbits, 1 rooster, 8 Guinea Pigs, 1 Raccoon, 2 Cavas, 1 Cuba Rat, 3 Ant Eaters, 7 Monkeys, 2 Woodchucks, 1 Opossum, 1 Armadilla, &c., &c. THE LECTURE ROOM, ETC.

-----------

From Traveling Show to Vaudeville, By Robert M. Lewis. Dog Days of the Museum. "The Happy Family" menagerie, one of its best-loved attractions, exemplified this appeal. Within the one large cage, predator and prey coexisted harmoniously, 'contentedly playing together, without injury or discord.' Puzzled visitors marveled that hyman agency could create the peaceable kingdom foretold in the Bible where natural enemies might lie side by side. Mark Twain was less than impressed by the condition of Barnum's Museum in 1867. The old museum had burned to the ground in July 1865 and Barnum had opened a new premises with an entirely new collection farther up Broadway, between Spring and Prince Streets. But it was smaller, dingier and for all Barnum's resilience and waning enthusiasm, less interesting.

About the new display of Barnum, wrote Mark Twain: : "... Neglected in a corner, and in some large glass cases are some atrocious waxen images, done in the very worst style of the art. Queen Victoria is dressed in faded red velvet and glass jewelry, and has a bloated countenance and a drunken lear in her eye, that reminded one of convivial Mary Holt, when she used to come in from a spree to get her ticket for the County Jail. And that cursed eye-sore to me, Tom Thumb's wedding party, which airs its smirking imbecility in every photograph album in America, is not only set forth here in ghastly wax, but repeated! Why does not some philanthropist burn the Museum again . . . The 'Happy Family' remains, but robbed of its ancient glory. A poor, spiritless old bear - sixteen monkeys - half a dozen sorrowful raccoons - too many mangy puppies - two unhappy rabbits - and two meek Tom cats, that have had half the hair snatched out of them by the monkeys, compose the Happy Family - and certainly it was the most subjugated-looking party I ever saw. The entire Happy Family is bossed and bullied by a monkey that any one of the victims could whip, only that they lack the courage to try it. He grabs a Tom by the nape of the neck and bounces him on the ground, he cuffs the rabbits and the coons, and snatches his own tribe from end to end of the cage by the tail. When the dinner-tub is brough in, he gets boldly into it, and the other members of the family sit patiently around till his hunger is satisfied or steal a morsel and get bored heels over head for it. The world is full of families as happy as that. The boss monkey has even proceeded so far as to nip the tail short off one of his brethren, and now half the pleasures of the poor devil's life are denied him, because he hain't got anything to hang by. It almost moves one to tears to see that bob-tailed moneky work his stump and try to grab a beam with it that is a yard away. And when his stump naturally misses fire and he falls, none but the heartless can laugh. Why cannot he become a philosopher? Why cannot he console himself with the reflection that tails are but a delusion and a vanity at best?

--------------

Student and Family Miscellany - published 1854, USA: Many years ago, upon the Surrey side of the Waterloo Bridge, in London, there might be daily seen a cage, about five feet square, containing various quadrupeds and birds living together in harmony. The originator and keeper of this collection, John Austin, was a stocking weaver, and a pigeon fancier. He was very fond of animals, and spent much time in learning their habits and dispositions.

After conceiving the idea of training animals of different natures, habits, etc., to live together, he continued adding to his collection until, during a period of twenty years, he had thus accumulated about seven hundred animals, and these all lived in content and affection.

It is not too much to believe that many a person who gave a penny to look at Mr. Austin's Happy Family may have had his mind awakened to the effects of habit, and the influence of gentle discipline and kindness, when beholding the cat, the rat, the squirrel, the dog, the hawk, the guinea- pig, the rabbit, the eagle, the fox, living together in peace.

He who trained these animals to live so happily in each other's company, a few years since passed away; but his mantle descended upon his two stepsons, by the name of Sutton. Others have attempted to make similar collections of animals, but nearlv all have failed in maintaining harmony among them for any length of time.

The first successful effort at an exhibition of such a "Happy Family" in this country, has been made by P. T. Barnum, of the American Museum, of this city. He employed John Sutton, one of those before referred to, to come to this country, and bring with him a collection from the animals which he and his stepfather had trained. The cut at the head of this art of training them by Mr. Sutton. The wire cage in. which they are kept is about twelve feet long, some three feet wide, and four or five feet in height. This family consists of about seventy members, including cats, doves, dogs, rabbits, eagles, house- rats, blackbirds, monkeys, white rats, parrots, squirrels, starlings, hawks, ant-eaters, guinea-pigs, magpies, etc.. . . aside their natural prejudices, and live together in as perfect harmony as if they all belonged to the same species.

The eagle, hawk, blackbird, falcon, owl, and starling, may often be seen together on the same perch, without the ravenous ones exhibiting the least signs of their natural disposition. Frequently the dog, rabbit, cat, rats, and. ant-eater will all sleep together in a corner of the cage, resting upon each other.

The most amusing members of this family are the monkeys. They are always active, running about the cage, sometimes boxing the ears of the rabbits, then examining the teeth of the cat, and playing with the guinea-pigs, etc. The keeper often lets these animals out of the cage, when the monkeys runaboutthe room, examining pockets, and performing various tricks displaying much intelligence. At the command of the keeper they always return to the cage again.

On inquiring how these animals had been taught to live thus in peace, we were informed that each had to be taken separately, and trained for a long time, or until it became familiar with its master, before it could be placed in the cage with others, and that the means used in this discipline is kindness.

Here is a noble lesson for those who would teach humans to live in harmony, and happily. If kindness can tame the savage natures of the brute, devoid of reason, how much more ought the influences of love to sway and control the passions of men, and incline us all to "love our neighbors as ourselves!"

And 0 what a shame it must be, for boys and girls, who are members of the same family, and who ought to love each other dearly, and treat each other kindly and tenderly—what a shame it must be for them to quarrel and try to injure each other!

---------------

America's Victory, by David W. Shaw: . . . Besides, we wish the Exhibition prolonged, in order that the 'vast unoccupied area given up to the United States,' may be filled up, if possible, with Yankee notions- not with baby jumpers, patent churns, straw cutters, and such like specimens of the fine arts, but with such handicraft articles as would be calculated to leave a better impression of the skill, taste, and genious of this great country. We would suggest another thing to the American commissioners of this World's Exposition: Barnum has in his museum, in this city, a collection of owls, mice, cates, rats, hawks, small birds, monkeys, foxes, hedgehogs, snapping turtles, a dog, and a bear, and what-not, all in one cage, living harmoniously together, and happily denominated 'the happy family.' The commissioners should apply to Barnum to make this cage his contribution to the Crystal Palace, in order to show to the wiseacres of Hyde Park, and Punch and the Times, that 'some things can be done as well as others.'


Abraham Lincoln's Cabinet

State ; Simon Cameron, Secretary of War ; Salmon P. Chase, Secretary of the Treasury ; Gideon Welles, Sec- retary of the Navy ; Montgomery Blair, Postmaster- General; Caleb B. Smith, Secretary of the Interior; Edward Bates, Attorney-General. They represented a great variety of political sentiment and opinion, and did not always agree. Mr. Lincoln sometimes facetiously referred to his cabinet as "The Happy Family."


Royalty


Politics

Parliamentary Debates By New Zealand Parliament. House of Representatives: . . . the honourable member for Timaru asserted that those miserable Superintendents had, in former days, been the curse of the Colony, to see that 'happy family' on the Government benches. it reminded him of a happy family he saw in a cage in London, where the rat and mouse laid down with the cat and dog.
The SPEAKER pointed out that such expressions could not be considered asa personally offensive to members of the Ministry.
Mr. T.L. Shepherd was merely saying he remembered seeing a happy family in London, and when he remembered that the Premier had alluded to members of the late Ministry as a 'miserable set of wretches,' he did not think he could be accused of speaking improperly in merely referring to a 'happy family' in London. He had no doubt that the present 'happy family' would revert to their former and natural instincts, and they would see disruptions in it before long. . . .

 

Letters of "An Englishman" on Louis Napoleon, the Empire, and the Coup D'état By The Times, London, London Times

Their journals, edited by Frenchmen, are displaying an eifrontery of treason paralleled only by that of the Constitutionnel and Patrie before the coup d'etat; and priests and acolytes are chanting in full choir the old Claudian litany of despotism :— " Nunquam libertas gratior exstat - Quani sub rege pio."

Now turn to England. The Cabinet is an infirmary—a ward for decayed statesmen and valetudinary Whigs. The designation of "the happy family," by which they are popularly known, is most unhappy. The real "happy family" consists of the most incongruous creatures—of the cat and the rat, the owl and the mouse, the hawk and the linnet, of animals that prey and that are preyed upon. The Ministers resemble them in one point only—their excessive tameness. A more fortunate comparison would have been to one of those brass bands which form the glory of Vauxhall and of the minor theatres. Some six or eight gentlemen, of various ages, heights, and sizes, with the same name, the same features, and the same cut, play upon the same wind instrument. The effect, though singular, is certainly monotonous. The family " tie" is too conspicuous. In the Cabinet, the "virtues" of the Greys and Elliots are relieved only by those of the Elliots and the Greys; and on the casual introduction of a new member, curiosity is piqued, and is sure to be rewarded by the ultimate discovery of a relationship. The Ministry has been breeding in and in, with the natural and inevitable result —political cretinism, scrofula, and rickets.

The Premier, the Cadmus of the crew, its inventor of letters, Brobdignag in words and Lilliput in acts, has scrupulously followed Fox's advice, " never to do to-day what, by any possibility, can be put off till to-morrow." By this admirable method of conducting business, the political capital transferred to his account by Sir Robert Peel is dwindling to an algebraic quantity, and now, in articulo mortis, he is setting to work in earnest. His nightly and his weekly organs affect a pride in his weakly state, and boast that if the Ministry is small in men, it will be great in measures. The surprise will give a zest to the performance, but that experience which makes fools wise is not calculated to render us sanguine. A batch of tailors, whose professional life has consisted in sitting crossed-legged upon a board, may, at a short notice, do the work of " navvies." The exploit, however, is too improbable to tempt any rational contractor to apply to them. Lord John Russell's merit has hitherto been to do exceedingly little himself, but to leave a very great deal to be done by those who happen to follow him.

The Colonial Office has succeeded to a miracle in giving dissatisfaction to the colonies. Pillage and murder in New Zealand, discontent in Australia, a quasi rebellion at the Cape, and the piece de resistance of a Caffre war, are seductive items in its bill of fare. The Administration has disabused the mother country of the mischievous delusion, that colonies should be a source of pride and strength to her; and she finds that their real object and utility are to offer a prize to thieves and burglars—an infinity of snug berths to the enfans perdus of the Ministry and aristocracy—a means of employing fleets and armies, which might otherwise be disbanded, or turned to some advantage— and to demonstrate to ourselves and Europe, that soldiers who cost more than any others in the world, are excellent targets, but miserable shots. Ministerial agents, emigration societies, and even Australian diggings themselves, struggle in vain to allure the emigrants who flock like autumnal birds of passage from the shores of Ireland and England. They shun the colonial coasts, and fly to the United States. Journalists and legislators, aghast at the phenomenon, affect not to comprehend it. The truth, which is in the breasts of all, rises to the lips of none. A man in America is really a man, and, even though he carry a hod upon his shoulders, the political equal of the President; in the colonies he is the associate of felons, and has been little better than a slave.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer has never yet reached to the height of a budget. The one that is annually consummated is invariably a sort of epic, with beginning, middle, and end,—the work of different hands and ages. That it should still be called the Chancellor's, displays the credulity that assigns the Odyssey to Homer, without the excuse of tradition and obscurity. The embarrassment of the Minister in the disposal of a surplus, which his own genius would never have procured, is now happily relieved. The Colonial Secretary has effectually disbursed it in the charming divertissement of Caffre triumphs.


London's Exhibition: The Crystal Palace

Happy Family in Hyde Park: Fig. 15. Punch's 'Happy Family in Hyde Park,' illustrating how the trasnparent walls of the Crystal Palace not only captured the vast human taxonomy, putting men and women in display, but also served as a reflective mirror. Acting as an official exhibition guide, Prince Albert points for a group of visitors on the outside to an identical group celebrating inside as visitors or as exhibits themselves. The world of man was both inside and outside Paxton's vast palace. (Punch 21 (1851), p. 38.

---------

Britain, the Empire, and the World at the Great Exhibition of 1851, By Jeffrey A. Auerbach, Peter H. Hoffenberg: Discussing these representations, Auerbach notres the John Tenniel cartton featured in PUnch two months before the display's opening, and ironically entitled 'The Happy Family in Hyde Park.' In this picture, the Crystal Palace was rendered a cage displaying primitive peoples, in the exotic form of 'a Chinese, an American Indian, a Turk wearing a Turban, and a bushy-haired Russian,' for the entertainment of their European brethren.


Victoriana - rats, games, vernacular

RATS - Driving the smaller roof rat from its territory, the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) flourished in England, eventually bringing about the vocation of rat-catcher, as well as the sport of rat-baiting. The rat catcher would supply thousands of live rats to the rat-baiting pits. These rats would then be placed into a pit with a single dog, often a terrier. The dog would be given the task of killing as many rats in as little time as possible. The sport of rat-baiting began to decline in the early 20th century, as it was considered cruel to subject dogs to the practice, though nobody really cared about the fate of the rats (“Rat-baiting“).

Ironically enough, it is a rat-catcher who is credited with the domestication of rats. The most famous rat-catcher in Victorian England, Jack Black served under Queen Victoria, and is recorded to have kept and bred those rats of unusual color and markings that he caught. In London Labour and the London Poor: Volume 3, Henry Mayhew interviews Black about his hobby of breeding:

I ketched the first white rat I had at Hampstead; and the black ones at Messrs. Hodges and Lowman‘s, in Regent-street, and them I bred in. I have ‘em fawn and white, black and white, brown and white, red and white, blue-black and white, black-white and red. People come from all parts of London to see them rats, and I supplied near all the ‘happy families’ with them. Burke, who had the ‘happy family’ showing about London, has had hundreds from me. They got very tame, and you could do anythink with them. I‘ve sold many to ladies for keeping in squirrel cages.

Indeed, in Victorian times rats were a popular pet for women, and were kept by such notables as children’s author Beatrix Potter (who dedicated The Tale of Samuel Whiskers to her childhood rat, Sammy). Even Queen Victoria was said to have owned rats (Ducommun 12).

-----------

The Rat; Its History & Destructive Character, By James Rodwell 1863, p. 10: In London at the present time these animals, being bred for fancy, are becoming very numerous, and sell at the rate of four shillings a couple. In shape and manners they are exactly like the barn rat, but rather smaller . . . The first who bred these for fancy and profit was a person by the name of Ostin (sic), residing in the Waterloo Road; and he was the first man who brought to perfection the happy family, which may be seen daily at the foot of Waterloo Bridge, London. He informed me that he first procured two white rats, male and female, from Normandy about three years ago; and from this couple he has bred an immense number in cages. He has also initiated his son-in law in the art of subduing the natural cravings of various animals, and reducing them to one standard of peace and equality. He exhibits his happy famly every fine evening in Regent Street, and in the present instance is my principal informant. At the time I write he has above a hundred white rats, besides others. He has crossed the breed with brown and black rat; and has produced a vast number of both brown and white, and black and white piebald young ones, which are pretty little creatures, and as tame as kittens. he says, they breed six times in the year; and when the young are two weeks old, the mother is again pregnant. The young ones will breed at four months old' He mentioned one female which bred so fast that she died from sheer exhaustion. But the natural powers of the rat for breeding are so great, that I believe few animals, if any, in the creation can equal them. He also informs me that these animals are sujbect to no diseases, except when kept in a dirty cage for any length of time; and then, like ferrets, they are sujbect to a kind of mange; but cleanliness and good die will soon cure them. The most he had in a litter were thirteen, and not a dark hair among them.

------------

Victorian Perspectives, By John Clubbe, Jerome Meckier: . . . famous picture of 'The Peaceable Kingdom. One such show had been invited inside Buckingham Palace in 1842; a decade or so later, Henry Mayhew had included a detailed description of the 'happy family' trade in his 'London Labour and the London Poor;' and in 1854, W. P. Frith had introduced a happy family into his celebrated painting 'Life at the Seaside (Ramsgate Sands).' There was even a parlour game so called. The term had, therefore, acquired lasting jocose connotations by Arnold's time. The reader encountering his enumeration of the brilliant and select coterie, Lord Stanhope, Gladstone and the rest, in all probability would have imaged them in the form of a domestic menagerie, evoked all the more readily by recollections of the many Punch cartoons by John Tenniel, who specialised in portraying public figures with heads of animals and birds.


Historical Miscellanies

Book re Horatio Austin, Arctic Miscellanies (London, December 1851); From the Preface: On the 4th of May, 1850, an expedition, under the command of Captain Horatio T. Austin, C.B., sailed from the Thames in search of Sir John Franklin and his missing companions. The ships composing this expedition were the ' Resolute,' commanded by Captain Austin, and the ' Assistance,' by Captain Ommanncy, together with two steamers, the ' Pioneer' and ' Intrepid,' under the commands of Lieutenants Osburn and Cator. On the 24th of September, the little squadron was locked in the ice between the islands of Cornwallis and Griffiths in which position it remained till the llth of August, 1851 ; and on the 7th of October, the ships arrived off Woolwich, after an absence from England of about eighteen months, having passed more than two thirds of that time in the Arctic Ocean. . . .

. . . squadron in the Arctic Seas, and its pages are a reflection of the harmony and good-fellowship, the order and the Christian union, which prevailed in the Expedition. We fear that the time is far distant before " the peoples" of Europe will feel any of the brotherly spirit which animated "the Austin Happy Family."

p 248 - future attempts, succeed as well. Should the art of printing at this establishment continue to improve at the same rate as heretofore, we will back our Arctic press against the world. In years to come, every little souvenir of our sojourn here will be prized for the recollections it will give rise to—of the comfort and amity that existed among the members of the 'Austin happy family.'

------------------

Curiosities of Natural History, By Francis Trevelyan Buckland, pub 1865: It is a general notion that there are many black rats still remaining in the vast city of sewers underneath the houses and streets of London, but the author of' London Labour and London Poor' tells us otherwise. 'One man, who had worked twelve years in the sewers before flushing was general, told me he had never seen but two black (or old English) rats.' His evidence, however, goes to prove that they are not quite extinct. He says: ' In my inquiries as to the sale of rats (as part of the live animals dealt in by a class in the metropolis), I ascertained, that in the older granaries, where there were series of floors, there were black as well as brown rats; "Great black fellows," said one man, who managed a Bermondsey granary, "as would frighten a lady to see of a sudden."

There are two exhibitions of happy families in Lo
ndon ; one stands at Charing Cross and about the streets, the other remains permanently at Waterloo Bridge. They both claim to be the original 'happy family,' but I think the man at the bridge has the greatest claims to originality. He is the successor to the man who first started the idea, thirty-six years ago— Austin by name; the present owner has exhibited eight years, and always in the same place. Both of these men told me that black rats were very scarce things indeed ; one of them had to give half a crown for a single one. He afterwards got another, but finding they would not breed in captivity, he turned them out under the floor of his room, to give them a better chance of breeding : the result of the experiment he has promised to let me know. p. 60


Artists

Wililam Powell Frith

My Autobiography and Reminiscences, By William Powell Frith: The greater part of the year 1853 was devoted to the 'Sands' picture, delays taking place at intervals from the difficulty of finding suitable models. I noticed an incident of pretty frequent occurrence, which I determined to introduce into the background of my picture. A couple of men were joint proprietors of a 'happy family' consisting of cats and mice, dogs and rabbits, and other creatures whose natural instincts had been extinguished so far as to allow of an appearance of armed neutrality, if not of friendship, to exist amongs them. When the cat had played with the mice, and had allowed canaries to peck it without resenting the liberty, a hare was made to play upon a tambourine, and during the finale, the proprietor's friend and assistant on the drum made the usual collection. The drummer wore a wonderful green coat; he was very ugly, but an excellent type of his class. As I made up my mind to introduce the whole of the show, taking the moment of the hare's performance as the chief point; it was necessary to enter into negotians with the proprietors. I found, as Iexpected, that they hailed from London; and I also found that they would sit, and the animals would sit, if they were sufficiently well paid for doing so. The chief proprietror's name was Gwilim (probably trained by John Austin), and his town residence was 32 Duke St., Tower St., Waterloo Road. he came to see me in London, and a day was fixed for the beginning of 'my' performance. it was late in December, when our enemies the fogs were upon us, that I was promised my first sitting from mr. Gwilim. Instead of that gentleman came the following letter:
Dec. 23, 1853

Sir
I ham sorry I Cannot as attend on you to-Day. My limbs is so Bad that I thout I Coiuld not Do you juctice, and It Being so Wet and Fogger I thout it Wol Make no Diference to you
I remain you
Mr. Gwillim
at 32 Duke St., Tower St., Waterlew Road


However the fogs lifted, and in due time I completed a tolearable resemblance of Mr. Gwilima and his establishment, including the ugly drummer; whose coat became my property, and did duty on many occasions afterwards. Under date of Dec. 30, says my diary: "Gwilim came at last. Set to work about 12; worked hard and painted him and the hare, having the birds arranged for tomorrow." Dec. 31 A good day at birds, cages, etc; finished them pretty well. Paid the man 30s., and bade him adieu.

William Powell Frith (January 19, 1819 – November 9, 1909), was an English painter specialising in portraits and Victorian era narratives, who was elected to the Royal Academy in 1852.
In 1851 the painter visited Ramsgate, the result of this being the first of his famous large scale crowd scenes Ramsgate Sands, which after over three years work was exhibited at the RA in 1854, and bought by Queen Victoria-Frith was a successful artist overnight. He received a large sum for the painting, but failed to keep all the rights to income from it, such as the sale of engravings.

------------

Sir Edwin Landseer

The Academy, Dec. 17, 1881 - p. 462: Some Forgotten Drawings by Landseer

I AM indebted to Mr. Sewening, of Duke Street, St. James's, for an interesting addition to the published facts of Sir Edwin Landseer's early art-history. It is proved by a packet that has recently come into his possession that some of the plates to the first volume of The Menageries, in Charles Knight's "Library of Entertaining Knowledge " (published in 1829), were engraved from pencil drawings by Landseer, then in his twenty-eighth year. All students of this artist are aware of the exquisite precision and delicacy of his pencil work, a sample of which was chosen to illustrate Harding' sUse of the Lead Pencil; and these little plates are equally remarkable for tine drawing, minuteness of touch, and breadth of effect. Nine of them came into Mr. Seweuing's hands, together with proofs of some of the corresponding wood-cuts. One of the drawing is signed in full, and dated. Neither in the advertisements of the " Library," nor on the title-page of The Menagerie», is any mention made of the artists employed on the book. The drawings are : — 1. Group of Animals of Opposite Natures living in the Same Cage. A representation of "a happy family," like that many of us can remember in its customary station before th« National Gallery. This one, which contained a cat, a rat, a mouse, a hawk, a rabbit, a guinea- pig, a pigeon, a starling, and a sparrow, belong to one John Austin, and was exhibited on Westminster and Southwark Bridges. In the drawing, the hawk's wings are extended; in the engraving, folded. . . . (Sir Edwin Henry Landseer, RA (March 7, 1802 – October 1, 1873) was an English painter, well known for his paintings of animals - particularly horses, dogs and stags. The best known of Landseer's works, however, are sculptures: the lions in Trafalgar Square, London. He was something of a child prodigy whose artistic talents were recognized early on; he studied under several artists, including his father John Landseer, an engraver, and Benjamin Robert Haydon, the well-known and controversial history painter who encouraged the young Landseer to perform dissections in order to fully understand animal musculature and skeletal structure.

Landseer's popularity in Victorian Britain was considerable. He was widely regarded as one of the foremost animal painters of his time, and reproductions of his works were commonly found in middle-class homes. Yet his appeal crossed class boundaries, for Landseer was quite popular with the British aristocracy as well, including Queen Victoria, who commissioned numerous portraits of her family (and pets) from the artist. Landseer was particularly associated with Scotland and the Scottish Highlands, which provided the subjects (both human and animal) for many of his important paintings, including his early successes The Hunting of Chevy Chase (1825-1826) and An Illicit Whiskey Still in the Highlands (1826-1829), and his more mature achievements such as the majestic stag study Monarch of the Glen (1851) and Rent Day in the Wilderness (1855-1868).

Landseer was rumoured to be able to paint with both hands at the same time, for example, paint a horse's head with the right and its tail with the left, simultaneously. He was also known to be able to paint extremely quickly—when the mood struck him. He could also procrastinate, sometimes for years, over certain commissions.

The English architect Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens was named after him - Lutyens' father was a friend of Landseer.

Charles Knight (March 15, 1791 - March 9, 1873) was an English publisher and author.


A Victorian Era Card Game - Happy Families

A card game played with a special pack of 44 cards, each depicting one of the members of a family. The object is to collect complete families by asking other players for cards they hold. The game was first devised in 1851 for the Great Exhibition in London, and though in theory you could use any number of modern families, there is great charm in the original names and occupations, so I shall stick to those. There are eleven families, with names reflecting their occupation:

Block the Barber
Bones the Butcher
Bun the Baker
Bung the Brewer
Chip the Carpenter
Dip the Dyer
Dose the Doctor
Grits the Grocer
Pots the Painter
Soot the Sweep
Tape the Tailor

Each family has four members, father and mother, son and daughter. These are called e.g. Mr Block the Barber, Mrs Block the Barber's Wife, Master Block the Barber's Son, and Miss Block the Barber's Daughter.

Any number can play. After the whole pack is dealt out, the first player asks someone for a card. Play thereafter goes between players according to whether the request was successful. If you have some of the Pots family you can pick any other player and ask, 'Have you Miss Pots the Painter's daughter?', or whatever card you might be missing. You must already hold at least one of the family to ask for more. The object is to complete a set of four, at which point you lay it down face down in front of you. If the person you ask has the card, they give it to you, and your turn continues. If they haven't, they answer, 'Not at home', and now it's their turn to ask anyone for any card they might have. It therefore resembles Cluedo a bit in the effort to remember who else is looking for which cards and what answers have been given.

Scoring is rudimentary. The original instructions say each player starts by putting three counters (safety matches will do) into a pool. When all the families have been collected into fours and laid down, the player with the most families collects half the pool. You then play a second round asking for entire families, and the winner takes the other half. A 'please and thank you' version can be played in which failure to use the magic words vitiates the request and the turn passes to the other player.

The illustrations on the original set, published by John Jaques and Son Ltd, are delightful Victorian caricatures, reminding me somewhat of the grotesque characters in The Hunting of the Snark. They are variously fierce, dim, vain, hen-pecked, over-fed, and dirty. Some of the children are helpers in their father's occupations but others are young liabilities. (Master Pots the Painter's son is eating the paint.) Some are ineradicably gloomy, but many are undeniably happy in their ordered world, a picture of the past.